Patterns and predictors of employer risk-reduction activities (ERRAs) in response to a work-related upper extremity cumulative trauma disorder (UECTD): Reports from workers' compensation claimants

Author(s):  
James P. Keogh ◽  
Patricia W. Gucer ◽  
Janice L. Gordon ◽  
Iman Nuwayhid
2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Zakaria ◽  
James Robertson ◽  
Joy MacDermid ◽  
Kathleen Hartford ◽  
John Koval

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan H. Spence ◽  
Louise Sharpe ◽  
Toby Newton-John ◽  
David Champion

2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Zakaria ◽  
Cam Mustard ◽  
James Robertson ◽  
Joy C. MacDermid ◽  
Kathleen Hartford ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.L. Shackleton ◽  
K.L. Harburn ◽  
S. Noh

Research designed to increase our understanding of behavioral responses to chronic pain resulting from work-related cumulative trauma disorders (CTD) has been limited. This pilot study's main purpose was to examine the test-retest reliability of self-determined work and power during maximum and submaximum efforts in the performance of wrist flexion and extension movements of the CTD-affected extremity, using the LIDO WorkSET Simulator System. Data were collected from 22 subjects (11 men, 11 women) with chronic upper-extremity CTD, in two same-day sessions. Subjective reports of current pain in the CTD subjects were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Upper-extremity work and power data were also collected on 12 healthy subjects as a control (6 men, 6 women). Pilot results included: acceptable test-retest reliability of the work and power measures in the CTD subjects; the CTD group demonstrated markedly lower (20% to 58%) maximum work, submaximum work, and maximum power values compared with the healthy group; gender variation was seen in the CTD and healthy groups with respect to work and power data, and women with CTD tended to report higher pain intensity than male cohorts. These results provide insight for future studies.


Work ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orit Shenkar ◽  
Jonathan Mann ◽  
Adele Shevach ◽  
Pnina Ever-Hadani ◽  
Patrice L. Weiss

Author(s):  
Michael J. Smith

Current theories of work related cumulative musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities indicate that causation is multifactorial (Armstrong et al.,1993; Kuorinka et al., 1995; Smith and Carayon, 1996). Prominently mentioned among the causes are biomechanical exposures which are believed to lead to “micro” trauma to tissues that accumulates over time to produce more serious injury. Also believed to have a role are psychosocial factors that lead to job stress (Smith and Carayon, 1996). There is some debate about the explicit role that these psychosocial factors play. Do they exacerbate the strain due to biomechanical exposures, are they co-causal factors, are they a necessary condition for biomechanical exposures to produce problems, or can they produce problems on their own? This paper explores some of the ways that psychosocial factors may affect the risk of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders (CTD’s). For a more detailed discussion see Smith and Carayon (1996) and Moon and Sauter (1996).


Work ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Naomi Schreuer ◽  
Yair Lifshitz ◽  
Patrice L. Weiss

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Gangopadhyay ◽  
Arpita Ray ◽  
Avijit Das ◽  
Tamal Das ◽  
Goutam Ghoshal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document